Search This Blog

Showing posts with label trans activism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trans activism. Show all posts

Monday 2 January 2023

How To Civilise Your Elders - Coercive Control



Follow up to How To Civilise Your Elders - The Air Horn Lie 

Published in the last week of 2022 was this typically lightweight, "cheery" site filler, the story of How I Deradicalised My Terf Mum, by Rivkah Brown at Novara, that [Bastani] bastian of alleged-Left media, fulfilling the faux-cialist need for political instruction, fluff and moralising screed.

They're really cool at Novara: all edgy polemics, yoof culcha, swishy hair and fierce street smarts.
It's a whole lifestyle, just like the actual communists would have. Ya get me?


Fellow kids

It may be worth pointing out that, though, that this kind of story - the genre of personal account by pseudonym - is often the work of a journalist without a story, and based on little more than an overheard conversation on the night bus.
Still, it's always telling that the 'bigot' relatives in these stories are pushovers, who, rather than tell the autocratic protagonist to go fuck themselves, fold at the pressure.
Even in their fantasy battles, the baddies are as affable and forgiving as a beaten puppy.

So, whether this story has any basis in fact is questionable, but either way this smarmy, intellectually vacuous article is, if true, a disturbingly manipulative account of the psychological abuse of a woman by her own children. One who's only crime is reticence in affirming her child's metaphysical belief

Sunday 23 October 2022

Rabbit Holes #2 - In The Class Known As Humans, I Include Men



In The Class Known As 'Humans', I Include Men

 

[This is a follow-up to Beyond The Terf, where I dunk the idiot's chant that terf is a self referential into the toilet and flush, several times]

Saturday 15 October 2022

Robbie Coltrane & The Shite Side of History



The gender wars, vicious, aren't they? And who is perpetually depicted as the ones inflicting harm? Who are the 'controversial' party? 

It's the terfs, sure? Well, have a think about when Magdalen Berns died. Remember the celebration?

Even now, three years later, they openly cheer. 

Aidan Comaford posts this, context-free screenshot a couple of times a month 
This person writes for the Independent under the name Gemma Stone

(note - just imagine how much she got under their skin. The constant repost of the most furious thing she ever said, without showing what led to it, is hilarious moralising considering what is to follow. I was inspired by her, this blog sprung up because of her. 
I even named my daughter after her. R. I. P Magdalen) 


A woman of 36 dying from brain cancer was very amusing to the "Be Kind" side. I could cite a thousand other examples but for the moment, let's consider how trans activists mock the dead. 


Sadly, Robbie Coltrane has died. 

Being British and slightly middle aged, I think of Cracker when I think of Coltrane. And Nuns on the Run which even my devoutly Catholic grandmother found amusing

I think of comedy sketches I have only vague memories of. I think of an avuncular, affable man, with intelligence and lightning speed wit, and quite likely also prone to fits of anger and scalding invective. Maybe that's just Fitz in Cracker, but it's what I picture. A fully rounded human being, but one with particular charm. And talent. 

But for many, this was a joyous day































Interesting. I can think of a truth that leaves them apoplectic and shitting their beds










Now, a new generation of people know Coltrane as Hagrid from Harry Potter. Harry Potter is what made him a global Star.





Tragically, there's a large crossover of Harry Potter fans and squealing shit-gibbons. TRAs, Woke Left™ brats with a binary view of human beings which starts and stops at whether they fully support their - pretty extreme and completely unexplained or justified - view of trans identity.


It's like one of those shitty western films where people wear a white or black hat depending on the goodness or badness of that character. No fully-rounded characters here. 





One of the funniest self-owns going on here is the hysterical and dishonest repetition that Coltrane is a terrible bastard for saying trans people sit around waiting to be offended all day. 

Clearly, he never did that, he actually said this: 

He told the Radio Times: “I don’t think what she said was offensive really. I don’t know why but there’s a whole Twitter generation of people who hang around waiting to be offended.


However the fact that they had this comment at the ready two years later, then warped it to make it more personal and really ramp up the implied offence - it says all you need to know about what un-self aware, dishonest, malevolent b****** they are. 


Of course Coltrane never used the word 'snowflake' or referenced trans people. All he did was remark on the desperate need to kick out on social media 




Not kicking horses when they're down, though... That's,, well, it's... just strange 

















It's probably more of a cognitive issue 





At some point, they really should fuck off with their reminders
















Unable to highlight exactly what JK Rowling said that was so egregious they dig themselves deeper into to an stinky cave of rage, being triggered by anything related to her, like furious trapdoor spiders, but without the purpose.





Enraged with her expression of grief, for her continued relevance to their lives and presumably for actually knowing Coltrane (or having free entry to the theme park, who knows) they let rip. 





So, with the edgelord fuckery of some brittle cry-bully not quite advanced enough for 4chan, they hustled together some amazing barbs and bullshit:



Fake accounts, entirely created for the misrepresentation of Rowling, dragged their grotty minds into the fray:







The need to separate Rowling from her own fantasy stories drives them insane, because they can't even separate Coltrane from her reasonable beliefs anymore. They try to cling to Hagrid, the creation of Rowling, and must truly loathe themselves.
 



Well rounded personalities are anathema for them. The children's wizard book is so beloved to them they suffer unbelievable cognitive dissonance at the idea it wasn't actually real. 


These people may be young, but they are young adults. Certainly old enough to have established furry porn habits. 

Look at this shit:




The hilarious plight of these morons enjoying children's literature to the degree they maintain intense emotional attachment in adulthood shows just how underdeveloped they are.

A warning from history. Maybe? 


Let's just remember that when they petition us with claims of endangerment, it may be they saw a coat on the back of a door, or heard a firework. These people are not grounded in reality. 




































Robbie Coltrane may have held different views to them, and it may be amusing as they flail around being pathetically childish, but the self entitlement is disturbing. They want to own the writer, actors and the story. They feel they deserve it



This isn't close to normal. It's a moratorium of stalkers. 

It's surprising they aren't chasing Radcliffe, Watson and Grint through the streets, demanding they do magic. It's quite incredible that no one has cornered Daniel Radcliffe and insisted he not go all "Terfus Deletus" or summon a trans rights dragon.

How they cope with knowing that Coltrane was not in fact a giant bestie to a speccy twat kid wizard is baffling. 

The self entitlement and they have is pretty concerning. The totalitarian, narcissistic rage is too. We genuinely might have a radicalised group here - one with the ability to dehumanise others at the drop of a hat. 




















 A bizarre thread possibly scolding Coltrane as a coward for... Dying? 






























































































































































































































From certain damnation

To a vague "not sure" "think I heard..." 







































Graham Hughes is a very malicious and Rowling - obsessed man












This did not breach Facebook community standards 























I document this, because one day I hope, my children will stare in bewilderment at how so many people became so insane. 
This is dehumanisation. We should know better by now

Rest in Peace, Robbie. May the good ground be soft