The gender wars, vicious, aren't they? And who is perpetually depicted as the ones inflicting harm? Who are the 'controversial' party?
It's the terfs, sure? Well, have a think about when Magdalen Berns died. Remember the celebration?
Even now, three years later, they openly cheer.
Aidan Comaford posts this, context-free screenshot a couple of times a month |
This person writes for the Independent under the name Gemma Stone |
A woman of 36 dying from brain cancer was very amusing to the "Be Kind" side. I could cite a thousand other examples but for the moment, let's consider how trans activists mock the dead.
Sadly, Robbie Coltrane has died.
Being British and slightly middle aged, I think of Cracker when I think of Coltrane. And Nuns on the Run which even my devoutly Catholic grandmother found amusing.
I think of comedy sketches I have only vague memories of. I think of an avuncular, affable man, with intelligence and lightning speed wit, and quite likely also prone to fits of anger and scalding invective. Maybe that's just Fitz in Cracker, but it's what I picture. A fully rounded human being, but one with particular charm. And talent.
But for many, this was a joyous day
Now, a new generation of people know Coltrane as Hagrid from Harry Potter. Harry Potter is what made him a global Star.
Tragically, there's a large crossover of Harry Potter fans and squealing shit-gibbons. TRAs, Woke Left™ brats with a binary view of human beings which starts and stops at whether they fully support their - pretty extreme and completely unexplained or justified - view of trans identity.
It's like one of those shitty western films where people wear a white or black hat depending on the goodness or badness of that character. No fully-rounded characters here.
One of the funniest self-owns going on here is the hysterical and dishonest repetition that Coltrane is a terrible bastard for saying trans people sit around waiting to be offended all day.
Clearly, he never did that, he actually said this:
He told the Radio Times: “I don’t think what she said was offensive really. I don’t know why but there’s a whole Twitter generation of people who hang around waiting to be offended.
However the fact that they had this comment at the ready two years later, then warped it to make it more personal and really ramp up the implied offence - it says all you need to know about what un-self aware, dishonest, malevolent b****** they are.
It's probably more of a cognitive issue |
Well rounded personalities are anathema for them. The children's wizard book is so beloved to them they suffer unbelievable cognitive dissonance at the idea it wasn't actually real.
Look at this shit:
The hilarious plight of these morons enjoying children's literature to the degree they maintain intense emotional attachment in adulthood shows just how underdeveloped they are.
A warning from history. Maybe?
Let's just remember that when they petition us with claims of endangerment, it may be they saw a coat on the back of a door, or heard a firework. These people are not grounded in reality.
Robbie Coltrane may have held different views to them, and it may be amusing as they flail around being pathetically childish, but the self entitlement is disturbing. They want to own the writer, actors and the story. They feel they deserve it
This isn't close to normal. It's a moratorium of stalkers.
It's surprising they aren't chasing Radcliffe, Watson and Grint through the streets, demanding they do magic. It's quite incredible that no one has cornered Daniel Radcliffe and insisted he not go all "Terfus Deletus" or summon a trans rights dragon.
How they cope with knowing that Coltrane was not in fact a giant bestie to a speccy twat kid wizard is baffling.
The self entitlement and they have is pretty concerning. The totalitarian, narcissistic rage is too. We genuinely might have a radicalised group here - one with the ability to dehumanise others at the drop of a hat.