A lesson on men being men, even when they look like they're not (although almost always, they do).
I got in a brief Twitter scrap the other day, until the inevitable boredom set in and I muted the dullard bastards.
Their argument; you can't differentiate between 'transwomen' and women, so any forensic examiner, nurse, carer, home help etc who says he's a woman shouldn't be questioned or doubted, just accepted and affirmed while he flattens the boundaries of those they are charged with examining, caring for, treating etc.
And, you can't exclude males from same sex spaces, it's basically apartheid, Jim Crow era segregation, 'back of the bus' etc.
But, we should still segregate along those lines, just while allowing entry to males who 'present as' or claim to identify as women.
Exclude the basic male by all means - this affirms the males who claim to have an identity conducive with a woman. Essentially, that's the purpose of them...
The premise, of course, was "TWAW!" and justification was transwomen are raped far more than you basic 'cis' bitches anyway.
I suspect a growing number of women are resiling from any previous exception they may have made. Chat all you want about increasing acceptance and polls that show women are generally very supportive of trans people, but...
... you will need to hide the follow up polls, when it's explained that we're talking about 'girl mode', gender fluid, 'queer', anti-cisnorm, own-dick-appreciators, and rarely post operative transsexuals.
The chilling 'Julie Miller' (top quote from his blog) is always a good case study, although he now vociferously denies being male, at least to feminists.
When pollsters explain the vast majority of these transwomen retain their penises and the rate of any medical treatment is very small, that strong theme of trans inclusion drops off a cliff. So yeah, don't mention that.
We as exclusionary fascists (joke) want no harm to come to men. Plenty of us are mothers of sons. We just want them to use their own facilities, that's all.
 |
| We are all mighty relieved to know 'Julie' can still get it up. Really vital information there. Fucking yuck |
The chilling 'Julie Miller' (top quote from his blog) is always a good case study, although he now vociferously denies being male, at least to feminists.
When pollsters explain the vast majority of these transwomen retain their penises and the rate of any medical treatment is very small, that strong theme of trans inclusion drops off a cliff. So yeah, don't mention that.
We as exclusionary fascists (joke) want no harm to come to men. Plenty of us are mothers of sons. We just want them to use their own facilities, that's all.
Their claims are that the fears of 'transwomen' are legitimate, but the well-founded fears of women (look at some stats on this from actual crime surveys) are to be tossed out and laughed at. And this has played some part of my change of heart.
Good Men Stay Out So Bad Men Stand Out
Back on the Twitter row, there was one man with a lot of lipstick but insufficient foundation to cover his five 0'clock shadow, and a gaggle of 'cis allies' - women who seem to fit every negative stereotype of 'feminine'.
Good Men Stay Out So Bad Men Stand Out
Back on the Twitter row, there was one man with a lot of lipstick but insufficient foundation to cover his five 0'clock shadow, and a gaggle of 'cis allies' - women who seem to fit every negative stereotype of 'feminine'.
I think, if toxic femininity needs defining, the female TRA would be a great example.
Anyhow, the original tweet was about a forensic exam following rape, and the victim is up on the bed with ... actually, here you are:
Anyhow, the original tweet was about a forensic exam following rape, and the victim is up on the bed with ... actually, here you are:
So, Skarlett, above, is dismissing the trauma of post male-violence androphobia, in a way few undecorated men could get away with. It's also essentially the same sentiment as parodied in the sketch - your feelings of safety don't matter.
We matter.
- Oh, also I want to use those spaces, be one of the gang, and take the sports titles too. And I will.
I've seen these rows often end with a series of challenges; "what if they've had surgery?" Or "what if they look like this?" posted with a few posed, photoshop'd, professionally taken shots of the most convincing transwoman. It's often also accompanied with the claim transwomen can't rape.
But, I thought women rape, too? I'm regularly told by angry people they've been raped by women. That women are just as bad.
I've seen these rows often end with a series of challenges; "what if they've had surgery?" Or "what if they look like this?" posted with a few posed, photoshop'd, professionally taken shots of the most convincing transwoman. It's often also accompanied with the claim transwomen can't rape.
But, I thought women rape, too? I'm regularly told by angry people they've been raped by women. That women are just as bad.
Anyway, often enough, the example transwomen look like this:
And there is, I suppose, an expectation we are momentarily stunned, racking our brains for a justification in excluding this 'OBVIoUs WOMaN!'
Now, I just say "no. Not even 'her'" unequivocally. I wonder why I ever accepted it.
Because, no matter how compelling my argument may be, even if they accept my reasoning and back down - which they won't - they will quickly reach the next boundary and scream blue murder about that.
Eventually, this is where it ends. A stalemate. When these men are so belligerent, so desperate to colonise, the long held position I once had - tacit approval, tolerance, even quiet support, on the sole condition they are inoffensive - is gone. No more polite aversion of eyes, understanding smiles and chit-chat. No.
They can't believe it - "Even she can't use your bathroom / access your rape crisis?"
"LOOK AT HER! She's like a Disney princess, she looks like Bambi for Christ sake!"
(I say) No.
"Why?
"What is she going to do to you? She's got a boyfriend - she's attracted to men!"
(I say) No. This person is male.
"She's not some hulking great transvestite trucker in fishnets. She's young, slight, she completely passes. You would force her into the men's..?"
(I say) Third spaces are a good idea. And pushing men to be more supportive and protective of their trans, effeminate, small, gay, disabled, naive and otherwise vulnerable brethren is, too. Why aren't you hassling men?
"How will she trigger your male trauma response, given she is completely passing?"
(I say) I said no. Other women say no. No.
"Can you imagine what would happen to her in the gents?"
(I say) I'm sorry men are sometimes violent to other, gender non conforming men. Please, tackle the men who actually do this..!
"Would she even survive a man's prison?"
And maybe Katy Montgomerie, or Ash Sarkar, or one of the other trendy populist MRAs join in: "Does the office sleaze just politely pass her by? Do predatory men ask for chromosomes before harassing or groping or raping? What a joke, mate...
"Truth is, she is more likely to be raped than a cis woman!"
(I say) This is actually contrary to all evidence. Trans people are in the safest demographics the world over. More have been convicted of murder than have been murdered in the UK, and as far as sexual offences, they are massively over-represen...
-"And, when the rapist realises she's trans, she'll be beaten up, maybe murdered, and the rapist uses a trans panic defence!"
It goes on forever, if you don't have firm boundaries.
I don't drive, but I know I'm less affected by 2 units of alcohol than some people I know who do drive, and have done so after 2 units.
There are always cut off points, and you may feel sometimes it ends in people deserving, not getting, or vice versa. The cut off here - are you female? - is very simple. And in l honesty, there's no division on the planet as pertinent as sex. Only age comes close.
"We can always tell!"
They mock us, with images of people like the person above, contrasted with pictures of us. And they expect it will shut us up.
I'll admit, no one is 100%, but we are accurate to an astonishing degree, even after tens of thousands of pounds of 'feminising surgery', electrolysis, hair transplants, voice training, hormone regimen. They can excise and invert their genitals; carve the bones of their face away, have implants, shave their trachea, have ribs removed - we, still, can normally tell. We are extremely sensitive to this information. It's survival.
If someone walks up behind you on a dark night, in a hooded jacket and stomping in heavy boots, don't tell me that you are not reassured when you see it's a woman.
Don't lie.
The picture perfect transwoman example above has been in the papers the last few days. Reported as a woman, and even as female. These pictures weren't quite as glamorous, though.
"Although Morgan identifies as a woman she does not want a full sex change" trills the Daily Mail in an article from 2015.
This is far from unusual - over 95% of 'transwomen' choose to retain their penis. And it is a choice, ok? Not can't access surgery - they choose to keep their dicks.
Despite the Mail having a reputation of pure TrANSpHoBic HatrEd!, it's a sympathetic cover and the comments are all complimentary and kind.
"However she is saving up to pay for a breast augmentation, chin reshaping surgery and a hair transplant to feminise her appearance."
Of course - these are the things that create the man-doll. This is the type of 'woman' he wants to be. He doesn't actually want to be, or be treated as, a woman. Almost none of them do.
Calling himself Naomi, Morgan, or using Clarke rather than O'Brien, he began dreaming of a modelling career, running in beauty contests and reaching the pages of red top newspapers. But it wasn't to be - he ended up in porn and prostitution.
'Naomi' is a character built on fantasy, it's all smoke and mirrors, a pornified wet dream in the mind of a fetishist rapidly circling the drain.
He has accounts on every social media platform and turns up on a host of webpages I wouldn't dare open. On Twitter I barely scrolled before seeing the hashtags barely legal and teen.
He cites DDlg; 'Dominant Daddy, little girl' - even the upper and lower case give a clue. It's BDSM, incest. Paedophilic incest role play. There is 'age-play,' #mommy #daddydaughter. And on one punting website he says his favourite fantasy is 'dad and his lad'.
Just imagine being his dad?
Taboo-transgressing porn acts as a progressive disease. We see it in autogynephiles all the time. Think of Jonathan Lea, AKA Emma Bella-Puttana. Or Shaun 'Gabrielle' Hawkes. Antony Scales, Richard 'Vikki Green' Grattige and Roger Spackman. These are often the most frightening due to the depth of their obsession, desire for depravity and delusional mental landscapes.
So no - Naomi can't use the ladies or work in jobs where being a woman is a requirement - Naomi isn't a woman.
And, to top it off, he's involved in all this. No. I don't give a flying fuck what the apologists say - anyone watching this stuff is at a minimum fantasing of doing this in real life. It's dangerous. They are scum.
"But so what?" the TRA Twitter twats contend.
"Look at her!? So what if she does porn - I thought you SWERFs didn't hate sex workers, thought you saw them as victims?
"This is her job - women do porn, women watch porn and do sex work and enjoy sex! Sorry to shatter your frigid sense of the world but the sexual revolution was a while ago.."
Now, if you weren't aware already, I'm going to let you in on something - Naomi, the person who looks like a woman in pictures he uploads, has just been convicted of truly unforgivable crimes. I don't know if 'Naomi' ever legally changed his name. I do know his born name is Nathan, and he will always be Nathan to me.
Nathan is the real person. The one who wants to keep his penis. The one who advertises porn and sex services with hashtags and fetishes built around paedophilia and incest. Nathan who was online encouraging and instructing a man to sexually abuse a four year old boy, again and again.
Nathan 'Naomi' O'Brien, who is just a young, vulnerable, 'sex working' trans woman, who couldn't harm anyone and completely passes, actually looks like this:
Nathan 'Naomi' O'Brien began conversing with a man online, and somewhere along the way discovered this man was a paedophile too, and had access to a little boy. 1,865 messages were found where O'Brien gave directions on what he wanted Jonathan Walker, to do to the little boy, and the pair of them had a great time while destroying the happiness, security and bodily autonomy of a small child.
“Following a tenacious and lengthy investigation" begin the self congratulatory statement "our dedicated team was able to prove that the female suspects' chats were not simply a case of role-play or fantasy - she had knowledge that the male had an interest in sexually abusing a young boy on the direction of her" said the police.
Female, they said.
O'Brien does not, in fact, even look like a woman.
Go on Twitter and the same TRA contingent are stamping their feet, screaming into the abyss 'SHE! HER! She is a paedophile'.
I could have written the same about Kadence Prinder, another young, glam, 'passing' transwoman.
"How would she be treated in a men's prison?"
Or Dakota? You think she'll be safe in the men's bathroom?
Or Jodiee? You think Jodiee Hart
is a threat?
Pinder's mug shot, again for child sex offences, is worth seeing:
And Marina:
Marina drove a long way, to remonstrate with the mother of his child - he was the better parent. She'll be better off with me. And, he won. He took his six year old daughter and immediately began raping her on camera.
And Dakota:
I could, but won't, go on.
While TRAs try to denigrate women with accusations of rape and of a ludicrous percentage of child sex offending, they of course say you can't judge on appearance. However, they frequently present images of apparently passing transwomen with claims of their vulnerability and 'need' of women's spaces. Sometimes, it helps to have a much closer look.
For instance, here's a fun meet up at trans pride / TENI / the Stonewall twinned country project (Netherlands and Lilliput):
Sexual dimorphism - owned!
There's something illuminating about seeing people stand beside their peers, or without the makeup and filters and photoshop.
None of these passing transwomen actually pass that well. Reality is a hard, cold floor to hit when you've been giddy and affirmed in cyberspace.
These crimes are particularly male crimes. They were, in all cases mentioned, committed by men.
And there is, I suppose, an expectation we are momentarily stunned, racking our brains for a justification in excluding this 'OBVIoUs WOMaN!'
Now, I just say "no. Not even 'her'" unequivocally. I wonder why I ever accepted it.
Truth is, this would never have changed if the activists hadn't been such repulsively misogynistic, insulting, despicable arseholes, so ready to threaten violence of all description.
We exclude 'her' because 'she' is a him. And because, as a movement, TRAs have shown themselves to take miles when offered millimetres, then piss over everything, we aren't being shy in saying so.
We exclude 'her' because 'she' is a him. And because, as a movement, TRAs have shown themselves to take miles when offered millimetres, then piss over everything, we aren't being shy in saying so.
Because, no matter how compelling my argument may be, even if they accept my reasoning and back down - which they won't - they will quickly reach the next boundary and scream blue murder about that.
Eventually, this is where it ends. A stalemate. When these men are so belligerent, so desperate to colonise, the long held position I once had - tacit approval, tolerance, even quiet support, on the sole condition they are inoffensive - is gone. No more polite aversion of eyes, understanding smiles and chit-chat. No.
They can't believe it - "Even she can't use your bathroom / access your rape crisis?"
"LOOK AT HER! She's like a Disney princess, she looks like Bambi for Christ sake!"
(I say) No.
"Why?
"What is she going to do to you? She's got a boyfriend - she's attracted to men!"
(I say) No. This person is male.
"She's not some hulking great transvestite trucker in fishnets. She's young, slight, she completely passes. You would force her into the men's..?"
(I say) Third spaces are a good idea. And pushing men to be more supportive and protective of their trans, effeminate, small, gay, disabled, naive and otherwise vulnerable brethren is, too. Why aren't you hassling men?
"How will she trigger your male trauma response, given she is completely passing?"
(I say) I said no. Other women say no. No.
"Can you imagine what would happen to her in the gents?"
(I say) I'm sorry men are sometimes violent to other, gender non conforming men. Please, tackle the men who actually do this..!
"Would she even survive a man's prison?"
And maybe Katy Montgomerie, or Ash Sarkar, or one of the other trendy populist MRAs join in: "Does the office sleaze just politely pass her by? Do predatory men ask for chromosomes before harassing or groping or raping? What a joke, mate...
"Truth is, she is more likely to be raped than a cis woman!"
(I say) This is actually contrary to all evidence. Trans people are in the safest demographics the world over. More have been convicted of murder than have been murdered in the UK, and as far as sexual offences, they are massively over-represen...
-"And, when the rapist realises she's trans, she'll be beaten up, maybe murdered, and the rapist uses a trans panic defence!"
It goes on forever, if you don't have firm boundaries.
_
There are always cut off points, and you may feel sometimes it ends in people deserving, not getting, or vice versa. The cut off here - are you female? - is very simple. And in l honesty, there's no division on the planet as pertinent as sex. Only age comes close.
"We can always tell!"
They mock us, with images of people like the person above, contrasted with pictures of us. And they expect it will shut us up.
I'll admit, no one is 100%, but we are accurate to an astonishing degree, even after tens of thousands of pounds of 'feminising surgery', electrolysis, hair transplants, voice training, hormone regimen. They can excise and invert their genitals; carve the bones of their face away, have implants, shave their trachea, have ribs removed - we, still, can normally tell. We are extremely sensitive to this information. It's survival.
If someone walks up behind you on a dark night, in a hooded jacket and stomping in heavy boots, don't tell me that you are not reassured when you see it's a woman.
Don't lie.
The picture perfect transwoman example above has been in the papers the last few days. Reported as a woman, and even as female. These pictures weren't quite as glamorous, though.
"Although Morgan identifies as a woman she does not want a full sex change" trills the Daily Mail in an article from 2015.
This is far from unusual - over 95% of 'transwomen' choose to retain their penis. And it is a choice, ok? Not can't access surgery - they choose to keep their dicks.
Despite the Mail having a reputation of pure TrANSpHoBic HatrEd!, it's a sympathetic cover and the comments are all complimentary and kind.
"However she is saving up to pay for a breast augmentation, chin reshaping surgery and a hair transplant to feminise her appearance."
Of course - these are the things that create the man-doll. This is the type of 'woman' he wants to be. He doesn't actually want to be, or be treated as, a woman. Almost none of them do.
Porn & The Downward Spiral
Calling himself Naomi, Morgan, or using Clarke rather than O'Brien, he began dreaming of a modelling career, running in beauty contests and reaching the pages of red top newspapers. But it wasn't to be - he ended up in porn and prostitution.
'Naomi' is a character built on fantasy, it's all smoke and mirrors, a pornified wet dream in the mind of a fetishist rapidly circling the drain.
He has accounts on every social media platform and turns up on a host of webpages I wouldn't dare open. On Twitter I barely scrolled before seeing the hashtags barely legal and teen.
He cites DDlg; 'Dominant Daddy, little girl' - even the upper and lower case give a clue. It's BDSM, incest. Paedophilic incest role play. There is 'age-play,' #mommy #daddydaughter. And on one punting website he says his favourite fantasy is 'dad and his lad'.
Just imagine being his dad?
Taboo-transgressing porn acts as a progressive disease. We see it in autogynephiles all the time. Think of Jonathan Lea, AKA Emma Bella-Puttana. Or Shaun 'Gabrielle' Hawkes. Antony Scales, Richard 'Vikki Green' Grattige and Roger Spackman. These are often the most frightening due to the depth of their obsession, desire for depravity and delusional mental landscapes.
So no - Naomi can't use the ladies or work in jobs where being a woman is a requirement - Naomi isn't a woman.
And, to top it off, he's involved in all this. No. I don't give a flying fuck what the apologists say - anyone watching this stuff is at a minimum fantasing of doing this in real life. It's dangerous. They are scum.
"But so what?" the TRA Twitter twats contend.
"Look at her!? So what if she does porn - I thought you SWERFs didn't hate sex workers, thought you saw them as victims?
"This is her job - women do porn, women watch porn and do sex work and enjoy sex! Sorry to shatter your frigid sense of the world but the sexual revolution was a while ago.."
Now, if you weren't aware already, I'm going to let you in on something - Naomi, the person who looks like a woman in pictures he uploads, has just been convicted of truly unforgivable crimes. I don't know if 'Naomi' ever legally changed his name. I do know his born name is Nathan, and he will always be Nathan to me.
Nathan is the real person. The one who wants to keep his penis. The one who advertises porn and sex services with hashtags and fetishes built around paedophilia and incest. Nathan who was online encouraging and instructing a man to sexually abuse a four year old boy, again and again.
Nathan 'Naomi' O'Brien, who is just a young, vulnerable, 'sex working' trans woman, who couldn't harm anyone and completely passes, actually looks like this:
Nathan 'Naomi' O'Brien began conversing with a man online, and somewhere along the way discovered this man was a paedophile too, and had access to a little boy. 1,865 messages were found where O'Brien gave directions on what he wanted Jonathan Walker, to do to the little boy, and the pair of them had a great time while destroying the happiness, security and bodily autonomy of a small child.
 |
| Jonathan Walker |
“Following a tenacious and lengthy investigation" begin the self congratulatory statement "our dedicated team was able to prove that the female suspects' chats were not simply a case of role-play or fantasy - she had knowledge that the male had an interest in sexually abusing a young boy on the direction of her" said the police.
Female, they said.
O'Brien does not, in fact, even look like a woman.
Go on Twitter and the same TRA contingent are stamping their feet, screaming into the abyss 'SHE! HER! She is a paedophile'.
I could have written the same about Kadence Prinder, another young, glam, 'passing' transwoman.
"How would she be treated in a men's prison?"
What about Marina, here?
Or Dakota? You think she'll be safe in the men's bathroom?
Or Jodiee? You think Jodiee Hart
is a threat?
Pinder's mug shot, again for child sex offences, is worth seeing:Kadence Pinder was charged with numerous counts of sexual exploitation of a minor.
Pinder already had one previous charge of sexual assault against a child when he was caught uploading child abuse imagery and storing meth amphetamine in his home, which was also a daycare.
Pinder already had one previous charge of sexual assault against a child when he was caught uploading child abuse imagery and storing meth amphetamine in his home, which was also a daycare.
And Marina:
Marina drove a long way, to remonstrate with the mother of his child - he was the better parent. She'll be better off with me. And, he won. He took his six year old daughter and immediately began raping her on camera.
And Dakota:
I could, but won't, go on.
What was the point of this?
While TRAs try to denigrate women with accusations of rape and of a ludicrous percentage of child sex offending, they of course say you can't judge on appearance. However, they frequently present images of apparently passing transwomen with claims of their vulnerability and 'need' of women's spaces. Sometimes, it helps to have a much closer look.
For instance, here's a fun meet up at trans pride / TENI / the Stonewall twinned country project (Netherlands and Lilliput):
Sexual dimorphism - owned!
There's something illuminating about seeing people stand beside their peers, or without the makeup and filters and photoshop.
None of these passing transwomen actually pass that well. Reality is a hard, cold floor to hit when you've been giddy and affirmed in cyberspace.
These crimes are particularly male crimes. They were, in all cases mentioned, committed by men.
Men, aside from any number of things, I implore you - speak up and let your brothers know you will make an effort to welcome other males.
I know it'll make no real difference, but I think it's important anyway.
Male people, all of you, need to stay out of our spaces.
No comments:
Post a Comment