Search This Blog

Showing posts with label screenshots. Show all posts
Showing posts with label screenshots. Show all posts

Tuesday 29 December 2020

Autogynephilia is a transphobic trope

I'm gonna start this article with a dare.

Go on Twitter or Facebook and mention autogynephilia on a public post. Await, with true suspense, for the response.

If you did this an hour ago and haven't been bombarded with abuse, a load of tag groups  or received some unsolicited PMs etc please contact me and let me know what world you live in. I want to join you.

If you don't include Jami in your feminism, you're apparently not a feminist

The conflating of what we once called transexuals with transvestites has not, contrary to popular belief, been the fault of us bigoted TERFs. It has actually come from places like Stonewall and all number of other advocacy groups

Here's Stonewall on Twitter 

The Scottish Trans Alliance

There's actually few Gender Critical Feminists (GC) who don't distinguish between the two, although it is always how it's presented - 'you TERFs think girls should wear pink dresses and bake cakes and boys should wear blue and never cry'. It's been a huge part of the incessant campaigning to remove all boundaries and categories. This is a central thesis to Queer Theory, for which I'd recommend you read Jane Clare Jones, Kathleen Stock, Heather Brunskell-Evans or Dr Em.

Erasing categories is integral here. The idea that gender dysphoria is the critical basis for being trans is now anathema. How dare you police bodies? You only recognise a trans woman as a woman if she's had her penis inverted? Shame on you, fascist.

In essence, this is the problem. If a woman has fears over sexual violence she's now a TERF and should be excluded, ridiculed and if she's beaten up, oh well, what-a-pity-nevermind. She will be misrepresented by an extent she is a parody of a creepy, frigid hysteric who wants to inspect pants and is obsessed with genitalia. In the (similar) words of the Republican right; penises dont rape people, people do.
So, back to autogynephilia, or AGP for the frequent flyer. 
I take issue with the ridiculing of the condition by some GCs. I'm far from convinced it's helpful, and, as we know, some of our trans allies have openly admitted to having AGP as the driving factor behind their transition; this includes those who surgically transition, i.e. lose their penises. There's got to be a very powerful drive to compell someone to make such radical and brutal changes to their body.
 
That said, with the notion of self ID, the expansion of the trans umbrella and the fact we know well over 80% of trans women retain their penises, it's more a crucial conversation than ever.
It's just extremely difficult to speak about without being condemned, abused and dismissed as the parody feminist who chants that all sex is rape.

Ray Blanchard, a sexologist, first created the term. It was in response to his treatment and study of patients with a trans identity. It wasnt an unheard of term then - the old style transvestic disorder could cover it. Other people have followed, with Ann Laurence, an autogynephilic trans woman who wrote Men Trapped in Men's Bodies. Michael Bailey, who wrote The Man who would be Queen has, along with all those with the temerity to defend the taxonomy, been unfairly dismissed. Here's a typical take down of Blanchard, with some digs at Laurence for good measure.

So, apparently it's a trope, a dog whistle. What this means is it is forbidden; taboo.
The most open displays you'll ever seen are the AGPs themselves, however.




Genuine apologies for the imagery. It's an infinitesimal fraction of the tip of a very large iceberg. If you have stomach for it, look at the hashtags #girlslikeus and #sissy, a whole world of degradation that hinges on cock-hungry submission.

Andrea Long Chu is a transwoman who wrote a book called ‘Females’ with the quote “distilling the femaleness to its barest essentials- an open mouth, an expectant asshole, blank blank eyes”. When describing how porn made Andrea trans...

Autogynephilia has seen a rise in popularity on porn sites. Sissy porn, too, has boomed. It's all about the subjugation, the worthless-fuck-puppetry of BDSM, and it's easily found online. 
Blanchard theorised that male-to-female trans people come in two types; the homosexual transexual, who feels a deep unease with their sexed body at a very young age. These are the people who mainly comprised the transexuals of old - naturally effeminate, often passing pretty well, attracted to men. Then there are the autogynephiles, or what we might have just known as transvestites. Autogynephilia, meaning love of oneself as a woman in Greek, is clearly evidenced in the multiple groups, tags, displays and porn genres which litter the internet. According to Blanchard's typology, AGPs are those who tend to be heterosexual. They transition later in life and often after long relationships with women, often having had children too. The end result is not that one group deserves more sympathy than another, but that the demands and expectations of the two are different.
Autogynephilia may begin with some excitement in cross-dressing. This will normally be private and shameful. All of this feeds into the fetishism - the forbidden.  It's often described as a drug-like hit, which in a similar path as addiction, becomes required more frequently, with more exposure to the world and the risk that brings. Ultimately this leaves us where we are now - middle aged, normally white males with a growing need for validationas women. While homosexual transexualism is an internal need normally sated by physical transition, the autogynephile will be caught in a cycle of growing fixation. Among the most prized achievement is that of pushing it to the point they become synonymous with other women around them. Autogynephiles boast online of entering women's spaces to masturbate, sometimes of leaving spunk on the hooks of changing rooms etc. It is not necessarilyas nefarious as this; but it happens far more than anyone would like to admit.


The crucial point here is breaching boundaries. It is not, as the 'classic' homosexual transexual, to merge seamlessly, but to encroach. Those AGP transexuals who have spoken out about this are pretty brave, and it's important to note that many of them are respectful of our spaces, and campaign for third spaces to accommodate them rather than demand they be allowed access.
Demanding validation, joining lesbian dating sites and reporting the women who turn them down on account of their 'lady-dicks'. Does this make sense yet?
Still, if you were lucky and experienced no deafening pushback earlier with that AGP comment, it might be worth checking it now. Have you been called a transphobe? A TERF? Have you finally been exposed as a notorious human rights abuser, erasing trans people and their rights? Are YOU the Christian right, climate denialism and Sargon of Akkad?
There's many places you can find decent and honest descriptions of autogynephilia;  Miranda Yardley writes about it; and here is the story of one man who has been deeply caught in it; Maya Kaye, a sensitive, sympathetic and wise transwomen talks here and here is Debbie Hayton, also being empathetic and honest.
You can also find the testimony of one wife here, advice to the wives of sufferers from a transexual ally, and their clinicians and more.
Trans activism fails to provide on-the-ground resources and outreach for homeless or domestic violence-fleeing trans people. Instead it demands those built by and belonging to women. It doesn't help struggling trans people who need a safe space, one that could actually fulfill their needs and not force them to either come out in an alien, potentially hostile environment, or to live stealth among women and their children, who will ask blunter questions.
No. It demands everyone, from drag queens to fetishists and men who choose their gender differently on any given day are seen as credible, committed and sympathetic as those who will pay to have their genitals reconfigured beyond any resemblance and removed.  It isn't helping trans people, it wont accept the realities behind the numerous causes of trans-ism, and it ruthlessly vilifies any dissent, especially from women.

So, what is really going on?

*Edited in response to Kay's comment. Occasionally worth reading his blog

Friday 6 November 2020

JK Rowling's OBSESSED with genitals! It's on Pinknews an' everything!

JK Rowling and her 'transphobic' attacks

It's official now, all the headlines have said it for months: JK Rowling is a bit of a sly transphobic cow, and her concern trolling is so transparent. It's the same for all the TERFs - they hate trans people
Harvey Marcell
Trouble is, for a long, long time women have lived and moved alongside transsexual women without much trouble. 
Russel williams

This probably has to do with the tiny numbers of people actually prepared to transition surgically, and their attention to social cues and wish to live quietly and not upset anyone. 
Michell Norsworthy

Skylar Deleon
Michelle Kosilek
Jerry Brudus
Dennis Radar / BTK
Jessica Hann

No swords, threats and mirror posing selfies involved. People moving on with their lives as best they can, generally being nice to each other, with the aggressors, whether they be sexually predatory or violent, being recognised throughout as male.We all know this, surely? Why do trans women want to access women's spaces? It's at least partly cos men are the danger, yeah?

Apparently, this is a terrible, anti feminist lie.

Synthia-China Blast




Regina Arthurell



They tell me that "You're problem is with predatory men - not trans women!" thinking they've somehow delivered a reality check that will send me scurrying off.

Patricia Trimble with 'adopted daughters' in jail

Kayleigh woods
Paula Denyer

To assign behaviors to men by pointing out it is they we are raped and murdered by, that's sexist!

Steven Hayes

As for the single line in a detective novel which says the murderer wore a wig and woman's coat as a way to avoid suspicion and disguise himself, that's just sick.

Buffalo Bill is a fictional character,  Joanne...

I mean, tranvestism as a paraphilia is never present in murderers! 

Susan Monica





Not here. Nor here. Or here. It's a dead end, a tragic old trope and that is that.
Tara Desousa

So, now we know how ridiculous a stereotype it is, they compare the division between male and female to that between black people and white people, and then you can see how wrong it is!

Ed Kemper

Even though there is no comparison.

Even though no race commits 97%+ of sexual offences.

Here's 
Sophie Eastwood 
Sophie Eastwood now living in jail as a diaper wearing baby

Not all men - for sure (although it's categorically insane that so called feminists are now chanting this).

Steve Wright


Hadden Clark



Beate Shmidt


Donna Perry


But, also, not all comparisons. You're sounding a little bit TRAcist.



Nope. Nah. No. Bollocks. Lies. Lies, they say! Trans women are women.

Paris Green
Magdala Johansson
Ed Gein

The idea that any remnants of masculine superiority could lie within those brave males who utter those three little words 'I'm a woman' but retain their 'lady dick' - that's disgusting, inhuman.

Brenda Shmalfeldt

Even though what she said was nuanced, expressed understanding and compassion for trans people, and that even many 'TERFs' care for trans people they know, have compassion and sympathy for those who are gender non conforming, or suffer dysphoria - it is anathema to those making their point by burning JK Rowling at the stake.

To suggest that self identification alone is not on a parallel to those who medically and surgically transition, well, how very dare you?

First, it's pretty telling the response from this, frighteningly large, element of trans rights activists is so filled with a sort of gleeful, triumphant rage at the idea that they have scared a woman, maybe exercised some ancient power over them. Hmm, which kind of power dynamics might this be categorised under?

Ken Howard, LA Therapy 

In a fraction of a fraction of the thousands of tweets which reference JK Rowling the misogyny is obvious (there are some at the bottom of this page, or here

As a woman who's had to rely on places where admission to trans women is particularly sensitive (prison; mental health units; hostels, women's refuges etc) and who's experienced multiple sexual assaults I'm massively grateful to her. We dont get much of a voice, sometimes we're not even regarded as women in the way more represented, better dressed women are. I can't speak for anyone but myself, but it's scary enough not having any control over your living environment, especially when you're traumatised. We know the rights fought for trans people have been abused by men seeking a new way to access and prey upon women. Why, for fuck's sake, can't we talk about it? 

Tyler here appreciates his inclusion 

 Full disclosure here, I can't be bothered with expending a single fuck over measuring my words anymore. This blog is my polemics and assorted uncomfortable facts. 


Giving painstaking thought as to how I articulate myself, reiterating at the start of every point how I feel compassion for, or solidarity with trans and/or dysphoric people, or how I've seen many things in life that are genuinely shocking and wearing unconventional dress or presenting as the opposite sex doesn't bother me - it never matters. These people dont give a fuck about your actual thoughts or beliefs, they're just too livid at your non-compliance to even see you as an individual. They don't want to counter contrary ideas, they just immediately form an in and out group, labelling you to try ensure anything you say is invalid and motivated by hatred.


 It is they who 'erase the existence' of the most vulnerable. So, fuck it. 

*Please see sex-lies-and-invidious-landscape.

Trans Rights Activists are often not even trans (think the excruciating, pitiful Benjamin Butterworth, Emma Watson, Owen Jones and other narcissistic pricks) (*no, 'non-binary' isn't fuckin trans) and they try to speak for trans people (unless those trans people have outed themselves as self aware, as inconvenient, as 'truscum' - thus they can be ErAsEd and their eXisTeNcE DeNiEd!!) - To me, this whole pitiful pit of wailing is about the existentialist angst of a load of well fed, well qualified, well brought up fuckwits gazing into the void that is their own hole. 

I don't believe ANYONE who's known real suffering or ostracism wields their purported victimhood as their most prized asset. Generally speaking we have other things to say when we finally scale the great barracades and reach the mic. Trans people are not included in this necessarily at all. This is about the autogynephiles outraged by pushback, the poncey little wankers who thinks wearing an earring on the other side is radical, alà schoolyard gaydar rumours, and some other unfortunates whipped up by their propaganda. People who believe trans people are murdered disproportionately and get beaten up every other day.

I know trans women who I do actually perceive to be women. This is not about 'passing' - it's about their solidarity with us, their implicit understanding that our fears are not to be dismissed. They laugh alongside us at viral posts on how convincingly sad or enraged some trans person seems to be about an essay they never read. Front and centre to these posts is the photos, for contrived gasping at how well they pass, as if that encapsulates the whole debate. As if saying 'I look like a woman - a pretty one!' is all we should need to stop whinging. As if it is a good faith representation of the issues. 

These transwomen who stand in solidarity know it's trash. They're not so swayed by a passing trans woman and list of fallacious points. These transwomen are angry, like I am, as they see the degradation of those they identify with.


Grandiose hyperbolics on how 'hurtful' it is to not be outright accepted is a terrible tell. It gives it away - you do not understand what it is to need a same sex space. 
Of course, I can say the samey for the middle class, helicopter-parented, lib-fem who heard a talk at uni 'that, really, like, got me' by a Jess Bradley type. They dont have a clue either - but they may have at least the foundation of it. 
The looks when our breasts emerge, the vicious, bewildering shaming, the fear when alone, or with men. They've been very protected, but still not as much as I would want them to be. They internalise the bad stuff and feel they've joined a newer, braver, stronger world, allying themselves with those very shouty men and doing all the bows and curtsies and emotional labour required to be safe. 
They kick the chairs from under us TERFs thinking they are one with the rainbow mafia. The poor, gullible things.

You really would need a decent dose of DMT to read all JK Rowling wrote and concoct this hissy fit on your own time. 

Chinese whispers took her words to the most paranoid parts of the worst brains, while they listened to nothing but Barney the Dinosaur and suffered the occasional waterboarding. 

It's the most dishonest demonising, all the while countless misrepresented stories are fed and some very salient facts are withheld. 

The edifice of lies, this incessant squealing of underdog-performing, entitled supremacy, it's just ugly, egotistical narcissism. It stands in the way, forcing those on either side into parodies of TERF and Tru-scum. It's reinforced daily by a media who purport to represent feminism, or the left, while they consistently present psychopathic criminals as endangered victims

It erases our identities, by dint of its inability to conceive of nuance, of anything which doesn't fit into a snappy slogan which can pass for passionate, self-made political opinion. 

We are meaningless, dull and irrelevant to them. 

JK Rowling, she's very rich, meaning she has no right to speak. This is everywhere - the 'former billionaire' Ryan-John Butcher speaks of is formerly a billionaire because of her charitable donations. Those who condemn the 'cishet white woman' who apparently can't speak on trans politics see no problem with the complete erasure of women on their own panels, shortlists or media debates on same sex spaces. 

Even politicians are terrified of angering the mob

No, transition doesnt end with a name change, a legal fiction, a new wardrobe. What shallow, commercial, superficial shit is this? Are there seriously people reading this who think these men cosplaying as lesbians, and pressuring lesbians for sex, is ok?



Is this ☝️ ok?
*more examples at the bottom of the page 

No, transition doesn't work for everyone. We know social contagion among adolescent girls is a well documented phenomenon. We have surgeons advertising their quick fix de-secondary-sexing of girls on Instagram. 
Surgeons who laugh at the idea of counselling beforehand, and who have done double mastectomies on 12 yr olds
 

A 4,000% increase in adolescent girls accessing the Gender Identity Development Service at Tavistock is not important, we're told. Despite nothing like this increase in the adult population, we are told these girls are reacting to the availability of transition and it's a good thing. The fact a massive proportion is also autistic is not your business either.

Hostels, prisons, toilets, changing rooms, refuges... Trans women are women so why exclude them? Who among these vocal supporters has ever been in a hostel or a refuge or prison?  
It doesn't feel close to threatening, or real, to wonder how it is to live with Tyler Porter, enjoying the women's refuge he's accessing, as a woman, when you know you would never be in that situation, when you know your family or friends would swoop in and fight for you.
    
How about Katie Dolotowski, Sexually assaulting a little girl in a toilet and threatening to kill her mum if she screamed?

Or maybe we should give some thought to the women living alongside Melissa Addis in a refuge? 

"melissa" Mark Addis

How about the women sexually assaulted by Karen White

Or the other cases of prisoners being raped or even having consensual sex with trans inmates? Do women in prison matter?
How would you feel if your naive little sister was inside, along with Kayleigh Louise Woods, Karen White, Paris Green or Jessica Winfield?

Or, the number of sexualised insults and threats aimed at women who have fears of, erm, sexual violence? 


Yeah, it must be that JK Rowling is the one filled with hatred, irrational fear etc. She's really abusing her power, trying to censor people for suggesting she doesn't care about pornography being posted on tweets that are aimed at her child readership - even when the porn is from that same group. 
Certainly this is not the livid shrieks of a deeply entitled community who care as little for genuine trans people as they do women.

JK Rowling was right.

If none of this has swayed you, maybe you will listen to trans people.


 Here's Blaire White 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?fbclid=IwAR3z4V0UrrYnfx6ueAf48kMDBn2AyQ6fUA1AYBYtDTCP57Lm4z-IoAhsqfY&feature=youtu.be&v=jyzZ3J6IG6s

Here is the brilliant Miranda 'zero fucks dispensed' Yardley 

https://youtu.be/TPVyZziLaqI

The uber rational Rose of Dawn 

https://youtu.be/mWi5AYB0WC0

I am hugely thankful for all these voices, and the many, many more who have tirelessly fought this toxic agenda, while suffering the last 'acceptable' form of misogyny in such vicious attempts to silence them.

Thank you

A thread on death threats directed at Rowling https://twitter.com/Dataracer117/status/1307020338748960769?s=19








 


















































After posing outside Rowling's home with bannners and posting the photos (with full address) on Twitter for Trans Day of Remembrance, these poor activists were victimised!
The people tweeting images of her home to protest for 'trans liberation' (whatever that is) are obviously the victims.
































Ryan John Butcher again...
























































































j
B